Las Vegas Review-Journal lauds journalism awards but deep-sixes word of circulation drop

On Sunday, September 21, the Las Vegas Review-Journal published on the front page of its local news section a story with this headline: “RJ wins 28 first-place awards in annual journalism contest.” Spread across all five columns, the prominently displayed, 1,185-word-long article about the Nevada Press Foundation honors jumped to most of another page and included 12 photos of beaming staffers working for the state’s most prominent news organization.

A week later, on Sunday, September 28, the RJ published another item about itself. But this one was much harder to find and contained no pictures. It was buried amid classified ads offering furnished rooms for rent (“own bathroom, kitchen use”) in the middle of the seventh section.

In the tiny type of a legal notice, the RJ published data showing another significant yearly paid circulation decline.

Paying RJ readers have now dropped 77% since the current ownership assumed control a decade ago in 2015. This appears to be far worse than the admittedly dismal national trends in the newspaper industry for the same period–even though the local population in Las Vegas has risen by double the national rate. Indeed, the paid circulation is the paper’s lowest in nearly six decades. One has to go way back to 1968 to find a similar number. What was once a market penetration of 60% of all households in its market of Clark County is down to about 7%.

As a newspaperman long before becoming New To Las Vegas, I find this incredibly sad. It’s especially so because the RJ‘s news product recently has shown some signs of life.

Continue reading

Drop in Las Vegas Forbes 400 members

Las Vegas Forbes 400They don’t make super-billionaires like they used to, at least in Las Vegas. That’s one lesson to draw from the newest edition of the Forbes 400 list, which came out earlier this month. The number of local big billies dropped from six to five. In 2016, the year I became New To Law Vegas, the count was nine. In recent years it’s been as low as two.

But the four Vegans who managed to stay on the list this year and last wildly outperformed the 396 other swells gracing the celebrated list of the country’s heaviest hitters. Collectively, the net worth of of these locals totaled $68.9 billion, a rise of 39%. The Forbes 400 as as whole: up a mere 22.%. Continue reading

Kroger orders its Las Vegas workers to keep mum about senior discounts

Is it possible to do the right thing in a wrong way?  Yes, if you’re Kroger, the giant supermarket chain.

From time to time, publicly traded Kroger, which has 2,700 stores under a variety of names in 35 states, mainly in the South, West and Midwest, rolls out a “Senior Discount” day. It’s 5% off for shoppers 55 years and older. The chain mentions the break in its print ads and often posts a sign near store entrances. Yesterday, September 3, was such a day.

But there’s a big catch, as I learned last night when I, a senior citizen, dashed into a Kroger-owned store (Smith’s Food and Drugs) near the New To Las Vegas world headquarters. You have to request the bennie at check-out or it’s no luck.

Don’t take my word for this. Nearby is a picture of the printed memo that Kroger workers were given for the big day. The bold-faced wording couldn’t be clearer: “Do not offer customers the Senior Discount unless they ask.” I have taken the liberty of highlighting the offending language in yellow.

The only reason I even know about the directive is because after I asked for the discount, the cashier had to scan the barcode next to the written admonition. As a long-time journalist, I’ve developed the skill of reading written words upside-down in case the person I’m interviewing has some interesting documents on the desk. And I’m gotten to be pretty quick with my cell phone camera.

It’s not hard for me to imagine elderly customers drawn to the store by the promised discount who then experience a senior moment and forget to ask for the break at checkout. It’s a terrible look for Kroger, and, perhaps, even a form of senior abuse. AARP, are you pay attention? I invite Kroger’s Cincinnati-based management to respond in the comments section below.

I cheered when a federal judge last year on antitrust grounds blocked Kroger’s bid to take over rival Albertsons. Now there’s another good reason: I don’t want this don’t-ask-don’t-tell discount stuff to spread.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on X by clicking here.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on Threads by clicking here.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on BlueSky by clicking here.

Las Vegas ‘Wizard of Oz’ remake is an anti-Trump allegory–by a big supporter

Outside the world premiere of “The Wizard of Oz’ at Sphere” in Las Vegas

Last night, I attended the world premiere of “‘The Wizard of Oz’ at Sphere.” That’s the much-ballyhooed remastering of the classic 1939 movie starring Judy Garland. It’s gussied up using all kinds of AI and other electronic and even physical tricks, like shaking sets, blowing wind and even monkey drones, before a gigantic screen dwarfing the audience on a number of sides. The production was made for the state-of-the-art Sphere performance venue just off the Las Vegas Strip. Technologically, it is a show to behold.

But equally interesting and even delicious is what I see as the underlying political messaging. It’s not hard to see the timing of this new production, which uses much-enhanced footage from the original film, as a biting allegory against the administration of President Donald J. Trump. What makes that so appetizing to me is that the moving force behind the production (and the Sphere) is James L. Dolan. The 70-year-old New Yorker, who also controls Madison Square Garden, the New York Knicks and the New York Rangers, has been routinely described for years as a supporter of and significant financial donor to Trump.

I couldn’t stop marveling (and laughing) at all the anti-Trump symbolism. While closely following the 1939 movie, the remake touches so many issues that now make the Trump regime so controversial.

Let me list a few: Continue reading

In Las Vegas and Nevada, a non-injury parking lot hit-and-run ain’t a crime

With a background both in journalism and law, I especially relish reading about local legal matters. But this has gotten to be a problem at the New To Las Vegas world headquarters as the media continue to wither away in Nevada. Some good stuff just doesn’t get covered.

Take the Nevada Supreme Court, based in the geographically remote, named-for-a-war-criminal capital of Carson City. The tribunal generally issues opinions only on Thursdays, and rarely more than five. But as far as I can tell, no reporters cover the court on an urgent regular basis, even though that should be easy, since opinions are immediately posted online and there aren’t all that many of them.

‘Tis a pity. The Nevada Supreme Court is not what I would call an influential state tribunal, like the top courts in California, New York and my native New Jersey, whose decisions are closely read and even heeded around the country. But the seven-member court has a moderately liberal perspective and an interesting jurisprudence that is still evolving. A surprising number of cases concern matters of first impression, in that they involve legal issues that haven’t been decided in Nevada, which for most of its history has been thinly populated with a correspondingly lesser amount of litigation. Laments a online-posted study guide issued by the library of the state’s only law school, at UNLV, “Nevada case research is limited by the fact that there is very little case law available to research.” I find Nevada Supreme Court opinions well-written and reasoned as they sort their way through often-uncharted terrain, and worth reading.

That brings me to a unanimous Nevada Supreme Court decision issued more than a month ago, which from what I can tell has gotten no real attention either in the news media or in legal circles but holds the promise of incredibly wide applicability. It is now the law in the Battle Born State that a hit-and-run accident in a private parking lot where no one is injured is no crime.

Residents and especially tourists, beware. Continue reading

Signs of hope for that medical desert called Las Vegas?

Las Vegas medical desert

First page of Joe Lombardo’s health care bill

It was sometime in the middle of the last century when Norman Biltz, a Reno tycoon and land baron also known as the “Duke of Nevada” for his considerable statewide political influence, talked about the proper way to conduct economic development in Nevada. “Nevada must be kept small,” he was quoted as saying in The Green Felt Jungle, the seminal 1963 book by Ed Reid and Ovid Demaris about corrupt influences in Las Vegas. “Let industry go elsewhere. Large industrial payrolls bring in large families, which cost more money in taxes for public services.” In other words, stick to gambling and hospitality.

The Silver State is small no more. Since then, Nevada’s population has jumped 11-fold (and that of the Las Vegas area, 18-fold) such that 19 other states are now less populous. But Biltz’s philosophy of minimal government and minimal public spending has persisted to this day. It is a major reason why Nevada sits at or near the very bottom of national rankings when it comes to key quality-of-life metrics touching on health care. Every day the state dearly pays the price.

So to me, New To Las Vegas, it was terribly interesting when Governor Joe Lombardo last week finally unveiled a bill for the Legislature to consider that would try to deal with a plethora of serious health care issues. A conservative Republican like Biltz, Lombardo is no big spender (except maybe, as an ex-Clark County sheriff, on law enforcement). So most of the proposals are of the free-market variety, removing barriers and regulation.

Still, it’s a start. Continue reading